Connect with us

News

Putin in Vietnam: A Friendship That Refuses to Die

Published

on

Russian President Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin has arrived in Hanoi, Vietnam, marking the second stop of his East Asian tour

Russian President Vladimir Putin has arrived in Hanoi, Vietnam, marking the second stop of his East Asian tour. This visit follows his lavish trip to North Korea and highlights the diplomatic support Russia still enjoys in the region. The United States has criticized the visit, claiming it provides a platform for Putin to promote his actions in Ukraine.

Despite these criticisms, Vietnam continues to value its historic ties with Russia while simultaneously strengthening relationships with Europe and the US. A notable symbol of this enduring friendship is a five-meter high statue of Lenin in Hanoi’s political quarter, where Vietnamese officials lay flowers annually in a gesture of respect.

Vietnam’s relationship with Russia dates back to the 1950s when the Soviet Union provided crucial support to North Vietnam. This bond was further solidified during the Vietnam War and the subsequent invasion of Cambodia in 1978, where Vietnam relied heavily on Soviet assistance. Many senior Vietnamese officials, including Communist Party Secretary-General Nguyen Phu Trong, studied in Russia and are fluent in the language.

Advertisement

Today, while Vietnam’s economy is more integrated into global markets and its trading partners include China, Asia, the US, and Europe, it still heavily depends on Russian-made military equipment and partnerships with Russian oil companies for exploration in the South China Sea.

The Ukraine invasion posed a diplomatic challenge for Vietnam, which it has navigated by abstaining from UN resolutions condemning Russia while maintaining good relations with Ukraine. This balanced approach reflects Vietnam’s “bamboo diplomacy” strategy, which seeks to befriend all nations without forming formal alliances.

Vietnam has also strengthened ties with the US, despite their history of conflict, in pursuit of lucrative markets and to balance its relationship with China. The US has objected to Putin’s visit to Vietnam, arguing that it undermines efforts to isolate him internationally. However, public sentiment in Vietnam is more ambivalent about the Ukraine war, with some admiration for Putin’s defiance of the West and skepticism towards US and European claims of upholding international law.

Advertisement

This ambivalence is not unique to Vietnam but is seen in other Asian countries like Thailand, which also maintains strong ties with Russia. The contribution of Russian tourists to Thailand’s economy is highly valued.

The future of Vietnam’s relationship with Russia remains uncertain. While Vietnam is seeking alternative sources for military equipment, reducing its dependence on Russia will take time. Recent high-level resignations within the Communist Party suggest internal rivalries over the country’s direction, but the goal of being “friends to all, enemies of none” remains steadfast.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Downing Street Indicates UK Would Arrest Netanyahu if He Visits

Published

on

Downing Street Indicates UK Would Arrest Netanyahu if He Visits

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could face arrest if he enters the United Kingdom, following an international arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC), according to indications from No 10.

A spokesperson for UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak declined to comment on the specifics of Netanyahu’s case but affirmed that the government is committed to fulfilling its “legal obligations.”

The ICC issued arrest warrants on Thursday for Netanyahu, alongside former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, citing alleged war crimes in Gaza. As a signatory to the ICC treaty, the UK is obligated to enforce such warrants.

Advertisement

Under the International Criminal Court Act 2001, the UK government must transmit ICC arrest requests to a judicial officer, who then determines whether to endorse the warrant for execution within the country.

“The government would fulfil its obligations under the act and its legal obligations under both domestic and international law,” the spokesperson said, emphasizing the UK’s commitment to its treaty obligations.

When asked if Netanyahu would be detained upon arrival in the UK, the spokesperson refrained from commenting on “hypotheticals.” However, the legal framework leaves little room for discretion if a visit occurs, given the binding nature of the treaty.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Judge Delays Sentencing for Donald Trump for the Third Time

Published

on

Judge Delays Sentencing for Donald Trump for the Third Time

A New York judge has delayed the sentencing of President-elect Donald Trump for a third time as legal battles over his conviction remain unresolved. Trump’s attorneys continue to press for his conviction to be dismissed, citing presidential immunity and potential interference with his upcoming duties as president.

Originally scheduled for sentencing on November 26, Trump was convicted in May on 34 felony fraud charges. The Manhattan District Attorney, who led the prosecution, opposes efforts to overturn the conviction but has suggested delaying sentencing until after Trump’s second presidential term.

Justice Juan Merchan, presiding over the case, has paused all proceedings to review legal briefs from both sides. These submissions are due in December, but no new sentencing date has been set.

Advertisement

With Trump’s inauguration looming on January 20, the court faces increasing pressure to decide whether the conviction will stand or if sentencing will proceed.

Trump’s legal team argues that his conviction undermines the principle of presidential immunity, asserting that legal proceedings during his term would interfere with his ability to govern effectively. Critics, however, have pushed back, asserting that no one, including the president, is above the law.

This legal standoff marks another chapter in the contentious relationship between Trump and the judiciary, as the nation watches closely to see how the case unfolds in the lead-up to his second inauguration.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas Commander Over War Crimes

Published

on

ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas Commander Over War Crimes

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The ICC’s pre-trial chamber stated that there are “reasonable grounds” to believe all three men bear responsibility for atrocities committed during the conflict between Israel and Hamas. These include allegations of murder, persecution, torture, and the use of starvation as a weapon of war.

For Netanyahu and Gallant, the charges stem from Israel’s military response to Hamas’s deadly October 7, 2023, attack, which left 1,200 Israelis dead and 251 abducted to Gaza. Gaza’s Hamas-led health ministry reports over 44,000 deaths during Israel’s subsequent military campaign.

Advertisement

The ICC accuses Deif, Hamas’s military leader, of orchestrating crimes such as murder, extermination, rape, and hostage-taking during the initial attack. Despite Israel’s claim that Deif was killed in an airstrike in July, the ICC included him in the warrants.

Reactions

  • Israel dismissed the ICC’s decision as “antisemitic” and reaffirmed its stance that the court lacks jurisdiction over the matter, as Israel is not a signatory to the ICC.
  • Hamas hailed the warrants for Israeli leaders as a “historic precedent,” while rejecting the charges against its own commander.
  • United States condemned the ICC’s actions, while European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell called for respecting and implementing the court’s decisions.

The warrants raise questions about enforcement, as neither Israel nor Hamas recognize the ICC, and compliance depends on the court’s 124 member states. The development marks a pivotal moment in international law’s attempt to address the human toll of the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict.

Continue Reading

Trending