Connect with us

Business

China bans hidden car door handles over safety concerns

Published

on

China bans hidden car door handles over safety concerns

China has announced a nationwide ban on hidden car door handles, becoming the first country to formally prohibit the design amid growing global scrutiny of electric vehicle (EV) safety and a renewed focus on passenger protection.

The new regulations, issued by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, will require all cars sold in China to be fitted with mechanical door releases on both the inside and outside. The rules are set to take effect on 1 January 2027, giving manufacturers time to adapt while signalling a clear shift towards more practical and safety-focused vehicle design.

Hidden door handles, which sit flush with the car body and often rely on electric power to deploy, were popularised by Tesla and have since become widespread across China’s rapidly expanding new energy vehicle (NEV) market. NEVs include fully electric cars, plug-in hybrids and hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles. According to figures cited by state-run China Daily, around 60% of the top 100 best-selling NEVs in China currently use hidden handles.

Advertisement

The decision follows a series of high-profile safety concerns, including two fatal crashes in China involving Xiaomi electric vehicles, where suspected power failures may have prevented occupants or rescuers from opening the doors. While investigations into those incidents are ongoing, regulators have moved proactively to reduce similar risks in the future.

Under the new standards, every passenger door except the boot must include a recessed space of at least 6cm by 2cm by 2.5cm on the exterior, ensuring that door handles are always accessible. Inside the vehicle, manufacturers will be required to clearly mark door-opening mechanisms with visible signs measuring at least 1cm by 0.7cm, making emergency exits easier to identify in stressful situations.

Cars that have already received regulatory approval and are close to entering the Chinese market will be granted an additional two-year grace period to update their designs, a move intended to balance safety improvements with industry stability and innovation.

Advertisement

Although the rules apply only to vehicles sold in China, the country’s central role in the global automotive industry means the impact is likely to be felt well beyond its borders. China is the world’s largest EV market and a major exporter of electric cars, components and technology, making its regulatory decisions highly influential.

International regulators are already paying close attention. Tesla’s door handle design is currently under investigation by US safety authorities, and European regulators are also considering whether similar measures are needed. In November, the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) opened an investigation into Tesla’s electric-powered door handles after receiving reports that they stopped working without warning. The probe focused on 2021 Model Y vehicles, with nine complaints recorded, including four cases where owners said they had to break windows to free occupants.

Chinese officials have framed the new rules as part of a broader effort to ensure that rapid innovation in the EV sector does not come at the expense of basic safety. By mandating simple, mechanical solutions alongside advanced technology, regulators say they are reinforcing consumer confidence and supporting the long-term, sustainable growth of the industry.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

IMF Warns Prolonged Iran Conflict Could Push Global Economy Toward Recession

Published

on

IMF Warns Prolonged Iran Conflict Could Push Global Economy Toward Recession

The International Monetary Fund has warned that the global economy faces a serious risk of slipping into recession if the ongoing conflict involving Iran, the United States, and Israel continues and keeps energy prices elevated.

In its latest World Economic Outlook report, the IMF outlined a worst-case scenario in which oil, gas, and food prices surge and remain high through 2026. Under such conditions, global economic growth could fall below 2% next year — a level historically associated with near-recession conditions worldwide.

“This would mean a close call for a global recession, which has happened only four times since 1980,” the IMF noted, pointing to the most recent downturn during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Advertisement

Energy markets have been under intense pressure since the conflict escalated more than six weeks ago, particularly after disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping corridor for global oil and gas supplies. The collapse of peace talks between Washington and Tehran has further heightened uncertainty.

The IMF cautioned that the most severe economic impact would occur if oil prices average $110 per barrel this year and rise to $125 by 2027. In that scenario, global inflation could climb as high as 6% next year, potentially forcing central banks to raise interest rates to contain price pressures.

IMF Chief Economist Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas said that while defining a global recession can be complex, growth around 2% would feel like one for many people worldwide, with rising unemployment and increased food insecurity in several regions.

Advertisement

Although oil prices briefly approached $120 per barrel during the conflict, they have since eased, trading at around $98.85 as of Tuesday. However, the IMF stressed that the risk of recession would increase significantly if current disruptions persist over an extended period.

A quicker resolution to the conflict could help stabilise the outlook. The IMF said that if fighting subsides in the coming weeks and energy production normalises by mid-year, global growth in 2026 could reach 3.1%, slightly below its earlier forecast of 3.3%.

Among advanced economies, the United Kingdom is expected to be the hardest hit by the energy shock, with growth forecast downgraded to 0.8% this year before a modest recovery to 1.3%.

Advertisement

Oil-exporting nations in the Gulf are also projected to face significant economic strain. Iran’s economy is expected to contract by 6.1% this year, though it could rebound by 3.2% in 2027 if the conflict ends soon.

Elsewhere in the region, Qatar — a major supplier of liquefied natural gas — has seen key infrastructure targeted, including the Ras Laffan industrial complex. Its economy is forecast to shrink by 8.6% in 2026 before rebounding strongly the following year.

Neighbouring Iraq is also expected to suffer a 6.8% slowdown this year, followed by a projected recovery to 11.3% growth in 2027. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia is forecast to maintain positive growth of 3.1% in 2026, accelerating to 4.5% the year after.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Dolce & Gabbana co-founder steps down as chair

Published

on

Dolce & Gabbana co-founder steps down as chair

Stefano Gabbana, co-founder of Dolce & Gabbana, has stepped down as chair of the company he established in 1985 alongside Domenico Dolce.

The move comes as the luxury fashion house navigates mounting financial challenges, including a debt burden of approximately €450m (£391m/$528m), alongside a broader slowdown in the global luxury retail market. Reduced consumer spending—particularly in China—has added pressure on high-end brands.

Despite stepping down from the chairmanship, Gabbana will remain deeply involved in the creative direction of the brand, continuing his longstanding collaboration with Dolce in designing collections and maintaining the identity that has defined the label for decades.

Advertisement

Leadership responsibilities have transitioned to Alfonso Dolce, brother of Domenico Dolce and the company’s chief executive, who officially assumed the role of chair on 1 January. Corporate filings indicate that Gabbana communicated his decision internally in December.

In response to shifting market dynamics, Dolce & Gabbana has been expanding into new sectors, including hospitality and home furnishings. Its recent offerings feature high-end lifestyle pieces such as a leopard-print porcelain vase priced at £1,084, reflecting an effort to diversify revenue streams.

Industry observers highlight the scale of the company’s financial obligations. Fashion expert Priya Raj noted that the brand remains privately owned, with both Gabbana and Domenico Dolce each holding significant 40% stakes—leaving open questions about future ownership structures.

Advertisement

Reports in March indicated that the company had engaged financial advisers and entered discussions with creditors as it seeks to manage its debt. In a statement on Friday, the firm confirmed that negotiations with banks are ongoing, declining further comment at this stage.

Despite financial headwinds and past controversies—including criticism earlier this year during Milan Fashion Week over a predominantly white model cast, which drew backlash from figures like Bella Hadid—the brand has demonstrated resilience. Analysts note that its distinctive aesthetic continues to attract a loyal global following, even as industry trends evolve.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Universal Music Receives $64bn Takeover Bid From Pershing Square

Published

on

Universal Music Receives $64bn Takeover Bid From Pershing Square

Universal Music Group has received a takeover offer valued at approximately $64.3bn (£48bn), in a potential deal that could reshape the global music industry.

The bid has been made by Pershing Square Capital Management, whose billionaire chief executive Bill Ackman said the proposal would involve a merger and lead to the combined company being listed in the United States. Pershing Square already holds a stake in Universal.

Universal Music, the world’s largest music company, represents a wide roster of global stars including Taylor Swift, Sabrina Carpenter and Kendrick Lamar. It also owns iconic assets such as Abbey Road Studios and major record labels including EMI and Island Records.

Advertisement

The company has yet to respond publicly to the offer.

Ackman praised Universal’s leadership, saying it had built a “world-class artist roster” and delivered strong business performance. He added that the company had successfully adapted to industry changes, particularly by embracing opportunities presented by artificial intelligence while safeguarding intellectual property.

However, he argued that Universal’s stock had underperformed due to factors unrelated to its core business, suggesting these issues could be resolved through the proposed transaction.

Advertisement

Pershing Square’s broader investment portfolio includes stakes in major technology firms such as Google, Meta Platforms and Amazon, as well as Restaurant Brands International, the parent company of Burger King.

Market analysts note that while Universal dominates the global music industry—home to nine of the top 10 recording artists of 2025—its revenue growth is closely tied to streaming platforms like Spotify and Apple Music, where slower-than-expected growth has raised concerns.

Although global music revenues have rebounded in recent years thanks to streaming subscriptions, debates continue over royalty payments to artists. At the same time, the rise of AI-generated deepfake music—where fraudsters imitate established artists—has emerged as a growing challenge for the industry.

Advertisement

In a letter to Universal’s board, Ackman said the company had “dramatically underperformed” key stock indexes, citing uncertainty around a significant stake held by Bolloré Group, controlled by billionaire Vincent Bolloré, as well as delays to a planned New York listing.

Continue Reading

Trending