Connect with us

News

Court Limits Protesters to Abuja Stadium for August 1 Demonstration

Published

on

Court Limits Protesters to Abuja Stadium for August 1 Demonstration

Justice Sylvanus Oriji of the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja ruled on Wednesday that participants in the August 1 hardship protest are restricted to the MKO Abiola Stadium in Abuja. This decision came as part of an ex-parte application brought before the court by the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, represented by Ogwu Onoja.

Minister Wike stated that while the Federal Government does not oppose the protest, intelligence and security reports suggested that some elements within the protest’s leadership intended to exploit the event to create chaos, damage public property, block roads, and disturb the peace. When Wike consulted security agencies about managing the protest, they reportedly indicated they were not adequately prepared to handle any potential crises on short notice. Consequently, it was considered prudent to confine the protest to avoid potential issues.

The minister submitted evidence from the “Take it Back Movement, FCT,” signed by Damilare Adenola. The document allegedly included threats to invade the Presidential Villa and damage the outer wires facing Aso Rock during the protest. The group also demanded that the FCT provide lighting and toilet facilities for the protest.

Advertisement

Wike sought an interim injunction to prevent the leaders of the protesting groups from assembling or marching on any roads, streets, offices, or public premises within the FCT from August 1-10, or any other day thereafter, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice.

Respondents in the suit include Omoyele Sowore, Damilare Adenola, Adama Ukpabi, Tosin Harsogba, persons unknown, and the Inspector-General of Police, among others.

In his ruling, Justice Oriji acknowledged the protesters’ right to demonstrate but confined them to the stadium due to the concerns raised by the FCT minister. “In light of the above, the court finds it appropriate and expedient to grant an order under the omnibus or general prayer to ensure that the rights of the protesters are upheld while preventing negative impacts on other citizens’ rights to movement and ensuring that properties and public facilities are not destroyed,” the judge stated.

Advertisement

The court directed the first to fifth respondents to conduct their protest exclusively at the Moshood Abiola Stadium. Additionally, the court ordered that the service of processes in the suit, including the confinement order, be published in newspapers to ensure public awareness.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Ten killed in fire at India hospital intensive care unit

Published

on

Ten killed in fire at India hospital intensive care unit

Ten patients have died after a fire broke out in the trauma centre intensive care unit of a government hospital in the eastern Indian state of Odisha.

The victims were all patients receiving treatment at SCB Medical College and Hospital in the city of Cuttack. Eleven hospital staff members are currently receiving treatment for burns suffered while attempting to rescue those trapped in the blaze, according to Odisha Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi.

Officials said the fire started around 02:30 local time on Monday (21:00 GMT Sunday) in the trauma care ICU. Early investigations suggest the blaze may have been triggered by an electrical short circuit.

Advertisement

Emergency responders quickly arrived at the hospital and managed to bring the fire under control. Patients in the affected units were evacuated and transferred to other wards within the same facility as the rescue operation unfolded.

SCB Medical College and Hospital is among the largest government-run medical institutions in Odisha and serves thousands of patients each year.

After visiting the hospital, Majhi told reporters that the fire damaged the trauma care ICU as well as an adjoining intensive care unit and nearby wards. He praised the actions of medical workers and security staff who, he said, “risked their lives” to save patients during the emergency.

Advertisement

The state government has announced financial compensation for the families of those who died and has ordered a judicial inquiry into the incident. Authorities say strict action will be taken against anyone found responsible once investigations are completed.

Hospital fires are reported periodically across India, with many incidents linked to electrical faults and overloaded systems. Medical facilities are particularly vulnerable due to the heavy use of electrical equipment, oxygen systems and the presence of patients who cannot easily be moved during emergencies.

Several similar tragedies have occurred in recent years. In 2024, a fire in the neonatal intensive care unit of a medical college in Jhansi killed at least 10 newborn babies. In 2021, a blaze at Vijay Vallabh Hospital in Virar claimed the lives of 13 patients being treated for Covid-19. Another fire the same year at a newborn care unit in Bhandara district in Maharashtra killed 10 infants.

Advertisement

Authorities say investigations into the Odisha hospital fire are ongoing as officials work to determine the exact cause and ensure similar incidents are prevented in the future.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump Urges Allies to Deploy Warships to Protect Strait of Hormuz After Iranian Attacks

Published

on

Trump Urges Allies to Deploy Warships to Protect Strait of Hormuz After Iranian Attacks

US President Donald Trump has called on allied nations to send naval forces to help secure the vital Strait of Hormuz following a series of attacks on commercial shipping linked to tensions with Iran.

Trump suggested that countries including the United Kingdom, Japan, China and South Korea could contribute warships to escort tankers through the narrow waterway.

However, defence analysts say the proposal may be premature, particularly as there is little indication that the conflict in the region is close to ending.

Advertisement

Even the United States Navy is not currently escorting tankers through the shipping corridor, which links the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and serves as one of the world’s most important routes for oil exports.

The strait has become increasingly dangerous for commercial vessels, with several tankers already reported to have been struck while attempting to pass through the area.

Meanwhile, Emmanuel Macron, president of France, said his country would be willing to deploy naval forces to the region but only for what he described as a “purely escort mission.”

Advertisement

Macron added that such a deployment would likely occur only after the most intense phase of the conflict had subsided.

Trump’s appeal for allied support comes despite comments he made last week suggesting the United States did not require additional military help from Britain.

At the time, Trump said the US did not need the UK to deploy an aircraft carrier to the region “after we’ve already won.”

Advertisement

The Royal Navy operates two aircraft carriers, including HMS Prince of Wales. The vessel has recently been placed on high readiness but is currently scheduled to sail to the North Atlantic rather than the Middle East.

At present, the Royal Navy has no warships directly stationed in the region. However, the destroyer HMS Dragon is on its way to provide additional air defence support for Cyprus as tensions continue to rise across the wider Middle East.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

India’s Supreme Court Rejects Menstrual Leave Petition

Published

on

India’s Supreme Court Rejects Menstrual Leave Petition

India’s highest court has rejected a petition seeking mandatory menstrual leave for working women and female students, saying such a policy could unintentionally reduce women’s employment opportunities.

A two-judge bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant at the Supreme Court of India said introducing compulsory menstrual leave could discourage employers from hiring women.

The judges warned that if the court mandated such a rule, “no-one will hire women,” adding that it might also lead young women to believe they were “not at par” with their male colleagues and could ultimately be harmful to their professional growth.

Advertisement

The court made the remarks while hearing a petition filed by lawyer Shailendra Mani Tripathi, who had called for a nationwide menstrual leave policy.

According to legal website LiveLaw, Tripathi had argued that working women should receive two to three days of leave each month to help manage menstrual pain and related health issues.

However, the judges said such a mandate could reinforce gender stereotypes and make employers in the private sector hesitant to recruit women.

Advertisement

They suggested that if such a policy were to be introduced, it should be developed by the government after consultation with stakeholders rather than imposed by the court.

The decision has once again reignited debate across India, where the topic of menstrual leave has long divided opinion.

Some supporters agree with the court’s view, arguing that additional leave specifically for women could create workplace inequality or discourage companies from hiring female employees.

Advertisement

Others say time off during painful periods would improve women’s health and dignity at work.

In many parts of India, menstruation still carries social stigma, with some women discouraged from entering temples or participating in certain activities during their periods.

Supporters of menstrual leave policies point out that several countries have already adopted similar measures, including Spain, Japan, South Korea and Indonesia.

Advertisement

Some Indian states have also introduced limited policies. Bihar and Odisha allow two days of menstrual leave per month for government employees, while Kerala offers similar provisions for university and industrial training institute staff.

Last year, the southern state of Karnataka approved a law granting one day of menstrual leave each month for women employees.

In recent years, several private companies across India have also adopted menstrual leave policies for their female staff, reflecting a gradual shift in workplace practices.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending