Opposition Demands Inquiry as Mandelson Steps Away from Labour Amid Epstein Document Fallout

Opposition parties have called for a formal inquiry into Lord Mandelson’s links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein after the senior Labour figure resigned from the party, saying he did not want to “cause further embarrassment” as scrutiny over his past associations intensified.

The resignation emerged just before 10:30pm, following the release of millions of documents by US authorities connected to Epstein. The publication marks the largest disclosure so far under a law that mandated the release of Epstein-related records last year, and it has reignited global attention on figures named within the files.

Lord Mandelson’s name appears among the documents, with some suggesting Epstein made payments to him between 2003 and 2004 totalling $75,000, now equivalent to about £55,000. Mandelson has firmly denied any knowledge of such transactions, stating he has no record or recollection of receiving the money and does not know whether the documents referencing him are authentic.

In a letter to Labour’s general secretary, Mandelson acknowledged the renewed controversy, writing: “I have been further linked this weekend to the understandable furore surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and I feel regretful and sorry about this.” He stressed that allegations he believes to be false require investigation, but said he felt it was right to step aside from party membership while he examined the claims.

“Allegations which I believe to be false that he made financial payments to me 20 years ago, and of which I have no record or recollection, need investigating by me,” the letter continued. “While doing this, I do not wish to cause further embarrassment to the Labour Party and I am therefore stepping down from membership of the party.”

Mandelson also used the statement to reiterate an apology to victims of abuse linked to Epstein, saying: “I want to take this opportunity to repeat my apology to the women and girls whose voices should have been heard long before now.” He added that his decision was guided by what he believed to be the best interests of the party to which he said he had dedicated his life.

This is not the first time Mandelson’s past friendship with Epstein has had serious consequences. In September, he was dismissed by Prime Minister Keir Starmer from his role as the UK’s ambassador to the United States after earlier revelations about the relationship came to light.

Opposition figures argue that Mandelson’s resignation, while significant, does not go far enough and have urged an independent inquiry to establish the full facts. They say transparency is essential to maintain public trust, particularly given Mandelson’s long-standing influence in British politics.

For Labour, the episode presents a renewed test of its commitment to accountability and openness. By stepping down, Mandelson has sought to draw a clear line between himself and the party during the investigation process, a move some within Labour see as helping to limit further political damage while allowing questions to be examined thoroughly.