The Conservative Party has dismissed Robert Jenrick from his role as shadow justice secretary after leader Kemi Badenoch said she was presented with what she described as “clear, irrefutable evidence” that he had been secretly plotting to defect in a manner intended to cause maximum damage to the party.

Mr Jenrick’s removal followed the discovery that a resignation speech had been printed and left unattended, an episode that senior party figures said raised serious concerns about his intentions and loyalty. Badenoch acted decisively after being briefed on the circumstances, signalling a firm approach to internal discipline as the party seeks to stabilise and refocus.

As a result of the decision, Jenrick no longer holds any frontbench role, and a successor as shadow justice secretary is yet to be named. While he continues to represent the Newark constituency in Nottinghamshire, he is now sitting as an independent MP. Under parliamentary rules, members are not required to resign their seat if they change party allegiance, allowing constituents to continue to be represented without disruption.

In addition to losing his shadow cabinet position, Jenrick’s personal membership of the Conservative Party has been suspended. This suspension strips him of several party privileges, including the right to attend the annual Conservative Party conference and to vote in future leadership elections.

Party sources said the swift action was intended to draw a clear line under the episode and demonstrate the leadership’s commitment to transparency and cohesion. Supporters of Badenoch argue that the move reinforces a message of accountability and strengthens the party’s ability to move forward with a united front, as attention now turns to rebuilding trust and setting out a clear political direction in the months ahead.

Security forces have stepped up patrols across major Venezuelan cities amid heightened political tension, as opposition groups intensified demands for the immediate release of political prisoners and renewed calls for democratic freedoms.

The increased security presence followed a wave of protests and demonstrations held overnight in several countries, many of them outside United States embassies. The gatherings reflected sharply divided global reactions to Washington’s recent decision to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro. While some demonstrators criticised the move as an overreach, others expressed support for the action, framing it as an opportunity to push for political change and the restoration of freedoms in Venezuela.

Speaking in an overnight interview, former US president Donald Trump was asked who ultimately holds authority over Venezuela. “Me,” he replied, while insisting that the United States is not at war with the Venezuelan state. Instead, he maintained that Washington’s focus is on criminal networks, saying, “We’re at war with people that sell drugs… that empty their prisons into our country.” His remarks underscored the US administration’s position that its actions are aimed at combating transnational crime rather than engaging in a conventional conflict.

However, the situation has also sparked debate within the United States. A senior Democratic figure criticised the US strikes on Venezuela, arguing that they lacked congressional approval. He said he intends to “confront the administration” over any proposal to deploy additional US troops to Venezuelan territory, describing such a move as a “non-starter” and emphasising the need for political oversight and restraint.

In Venezuela, the human impact of the unfolding events has come into sharper focus. Speaking publicly for the first time since his parents were taken into custody, Maduro Guerra warned of the broader implications of the situation. “If we normalise the kidnapping of a head of state, no country is safe,” he said, framing the episode as a dangerous precedent with global consequences.

Amid the uncertainty, the Venezuelan opposition has sought to redirect attention toward longstanding human rights concerns. The movement led by opposition figure María Corina Machado has formally demanded the release of all political prisoners. In a statement posted on X by her Vente Venezuela movement, the group called on authorities to act without delay. “Those who unjustly hold the civilian and military political prisoners should free them immediately,” the statement read.

Machado later reposted the message, amplifying the call and reinforcing her movement’s stance that meaningful stability can only be achieved through justice, due process, and respect for fundamental rights. Supporters say the renewed focus on political prisoners reflects growing optimism that international attention could help create momentum for dialogue, reconciliation, and a more inclusive political future for Venezuela.

Venezuela has entered a new political phase after former vice president Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as interim president, a move officials described as a constitutional step aimed at preserving institutional stability during an exceptional period for the country.

Rodríguez took the oath of office at a formal ceremony overseen by her brother, Jorge Rodríguez, who serves as president of Venezuela’s National Assembly. The swearing-in was presented by lawmakers as a necessary measure to ensure continuity of governance while President Nicolás Maduro faces legal proceedings abroad.

In her first remarks as interim leader, Rodríguez struck an emotional tone, acknowledging the gravity of the moment and the strain it has placed on the nation. She described President Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, as “two heroes,” praising their resilience and what she called their sacrifices in the face of sustained external pressure.

Rodríguez said she accepted the oath “with pain,” pointing to the hardship endured by Venezuelans as a result of what she characterised as “illegitimate military aggression” and foreign interference. She emphasised that her interim role was rooted in loyalty to the existing political project and a commitment to safeguarding national sovereignty.