Connect with us

News

COP29 Climate Deal Draws Mixed Reactions Amid Funding Shortfall

Published

on

COP29 Climate Deal Draws Mixed Reactions Amid Funding Shortfall

The COP29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, concluded with a landmark agreement to raise $300 billion annually by 2035 to help poorer nations tackle climate change. However, the deal, reached after 33 hours of extended negotiations, has faced sharp criticism from developing countries, which argue that the funding falls drastically short of their demands.

Developing nations had sought $1.3 trillion per year to address the climate crisis, a figure they argue reflects the scale of the challenge they face. While the agreement includes a commitment to mobilize $1.3 trillion from public and private sources by 2035, the immediate pledge of $300 billion annually was dismissed by many as insufficient.

India’s representative, Leela Nandan, called the amount “abysmally poor,” while Cedric Schuster, chair of the Alliance of Small Island States, highlighted the existential threat faced by low-lying nations. “Our islands are sinking. How can you expect us to go back to the women, men, and children of our countries with a poor deal?” Schuster asked.

Advertisement

The agreement acknowledged the disproportionate impact of climate change on developing nations, which have contributed the least to global emissions. Simon Stiell, head of the UN climate body, admitted the deal was imperfect but emphasized the need to press forward. “No country got everything they wanted, and we leave Baku with a mountain of work still to do,” he stated.

The summit nearly collapsed as talks dragged on past the deadline, but the final deal was met with applause in the early hours of Sunday morning. While some celebrated the funding increase, others voiced their frustration at the slow pace of global action.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Downing Street Indicates UK Would Arrest Netanyahu if He Visits

Published

on

Downing Street Indicates UK Would Arrest Netanyahu if He Visits

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could face arrest if he enters the United Kingdom, following an international arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC), according to indications from No 10.

A spokesperson for UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak declined to comment on the specifics of Netanyahu’s case but affirmed that the government is committed to fulfilling its “legal obligations.”

The ICC issued arrest warrants on Thursday for Netanyahu, alongside former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, citing alleged war crimes in Gaza. As a signatory to the ICC treaty, the UK is obligated to enforce such warrants.

Advertisement

Under the International Criminal Court Act 2001, the UK government must transmit ICC arrest requests to a judicial officer, who then determines whether to endorse the warrant for execution within the country.

“The government would fulfil its obligations under the act and its legal obligations under both domestic and international law,” the spokesperson said, emphasizing the UK’s commitment to its treaty obligations.

When asked if Netanyahu would be detained upon arrival in the UK, the spokesperson refrained from commenting on “hypotheticals.” However, the legal framework leaves little room for discretion if a visit occurs, given the binding nature of the treaty.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Judge Delays Sentencing for Donald Trump for the Third Time

Published

on

Judge Delays Sentencing for Donald Trump for the Third Time

A New York judge has delayed the sentencing of President-elect Donald Trump for a third time as legal battles over his conviction remain unresolved. Trump’s attorneys continue to press for his conviction to be dismissed, citing presidential immunity and potential interference with his upcoming duties as president.

Originally scheduled for sentencing on November 26, Trump was convicted in May on 34 felony fraud charges. The Manhattan District Attorney, who led the prosecution, opposes efforts to overturn the conviction but has suggested delaying sentencing until after Trump’s second presidential term.

Justice Juan Merchan, presiding over the case, has paused all proceedings to review legal briefs from both sides. These submissions are due in December, but no new sentencing date has been set.

Advertisement

With Trump’s inauguration looming on January 20, the court faces increasing pressure to decide whether the conviction will stand or if sentencing will proceed.

Trump’s legal team argues that his conviction undermines the principle of presidential immunity, asserting that legal proceedings during his term would interfere with his ability to govern effectively. Critics, however, have pushed back, asserting that no one, including the president, is above the law.

This legal standoff marks another chapter in the contentious relationship between Trump and the judiciary, as the nation watches closely to see how the case unfolds in the lead-up to his second inauguration.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas Commander Over War Crimes

Published

on

ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas Commander Over War Crimes

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The ICC’s pre-trial chamber stated that there are “reasonable grounds” to believe all three men bear responsibility for atrocities committed during the conflict between Israel and Hamas. These include allegations of murder, persecution, torture, and the use of starvation as a weapon of war.

For Netanyahu and Gallant, the charges stem from Israel’s military response to Hamas’s deadly October 7, 2023, attack, which left 1,200 Israelis dead and 251 abducted to Gaza. Gaza’s Hamas-led health ministry reports over 44,000 deaths during Israel’s subsequent military campaign.

Advertisement

The ICC accuses Deif, Hamas’s military leader, of orchestrating crimes such as murder, extermination, rape, and hostage-taking during the initial attack. Despite Israel’s claim that Deif was killed in an airstrike in July, the ICC included him in the warrants.

Reactions

  • Israel dismissed the ICC’s decision as “antisemitic” and reaffirmed its stance that the court lacks jurisdiction over the matter, as Israel is not a signatory to the ICC.
  • Hamas hailed the warrants for Israeli leaders as a “historic precedent,” while rejecting the charges against its own commander.
  • United States condemned the ICC’s actions, while European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell called for respecting and implementing the court’s decisions.

The warrants raise questions about enforcement, as neither Israel nor Hamas recognize the ICC, and compliance depends on the court’s 124 member states. The development marks a pivotal moment in international law’s attempt to address the human toll of the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict.

Continue Reading

Trending